Saskatory

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

The Vanderhaeghe Prophesy


I was reading this week’s issue of Maclean’s Magazine and came across an article on Noah Richler’s (Modecai’s son) new book, This is My Country, What’s Yours?. For the book, Richler traveled across the country, interviewing 100 Canadian writers to create a “literary atlas” of Canada.

Among the authors that Richler interviewed is Saskatchewan’s own, Governor General’s Medal-winning Guy Vanderhaeghe. When asked why so much “great historical fiction has come out of Saskatchewan,” he replied: “Because we’ve got no f--cking future, that’s why.”

When I read Vanderhaeghe’s comments, my initial reaction was uncharacteristically taciturn. Then I wondered: do I agree with his statement? During the five years that I lived outside Saskatchewan, I spent considerable time and energy defending Saskatchewan as a great place to live with a formidable future. However, given my humdrum reaction to the obvious slight at the province, I’ve realized that I, like so many Saskatchewanians (perhaps Vanderhaeghe included) have already, may be falling victim to accepting mediocrity and not expecting more out of the province.

Have I really become disillusioned with the state of our province? Rather than holding out for better times ahead if the government changes, have I written off the possibility that even if the people if the people of Saskatchewan come to their senses and toss out Calvert and Company, there is just too much lost time to make up; so much so that we never could? Do I feel that the socialism that is so ingrained in our culture too much to overcome?

If my attitude has changed, it is not difficult to understand why. After traveling back to Calgary for the Labour Day long weekend and being reminded of the prosperity that abounds there, it is depressing for a young person to return to this slow and seemingly uninspired province. Sadly, years of socialist rule has crippled Saskatchewan’s ability to compete with the kind of entrepreneurial voracity that exists in Alberta. It is this edge that our neighbour to the West has over us that could interminably inhibit our potential growth unless a fundamental culture shift takes place in Saskatchewan; even the parts that profess to be unwaveringly supportive of free enterprise are inherently socialist. I fear that unless this radical shift happens, Mr. Vanderhaeghe’s prediction is destined for consummation. Sadly, at this point it seems more likely than not.

8 Comments:

  • Why is the solution a new government?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:45 AM  

  • As you will notice if you re-read my post, I do not say that the solution is a new government, but rather a fundamental change in attitude among the people of the province. In fact, I'm doubtful that a change in government will necessarily allow us to get to where we should be (as I also state).

    Nevertheless, by changing the government we would have one that promotes free enterprise, entrepreneurial spirit and business. Governments should provide leadership to the people that they serve and if leadership is provided in this direction, it could spark the shift in attitude that is so badly needed so that we are more productive and competitive. This would surely lift morale and improve the peoples' outlook for the future.

    By Blogger Saskatory, at 11:08 AM  

  • The current gov has done good things for business. There is a perception problem indeed. People her still believe farming drives the economy.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:53 PM  

  • I will admit that the last provincial budget was good for business, but a business friendly atmosphere doesn't exist to the extent that it could because the government is, essentially, a left wing party based on socialist ideals.

    And you do have another point - the economy is not driven by farming. However, businesses such as those that were established in Yorkton today can use agricultural resources to fuel other industries. These industries can be created in rural Saskatchewan so that these areas of the province don't die and people can continue to farm, despite poor grain prices.

    By Blogger Saskatory, at 7:55 PM  

  • So then you admit that government is doing the right things. And you admit that rural Saskatchewan is doing well. What is Saskatchewan in need of? I don't understand business atmosphere. I have friends who run a businesses and they are making more money now than they ever have. I hear the arguement. I want to understand the arguement. However, it is so vague that no one understands.

    Where does the government need to go to go to the extent? What are those extensions of current policy that take us there?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:46 PM  

  • I think that saying Saskatchewan has no future is defeatist and a symptom of the problems in Saskatchewan. I moved here from Alberta to start an ag business and noticed a different attitude in people in Sask. They (over-generalization) are less confident and much more critical of anyone who risks anything to try something slightly different. It's no wonder people are unwilling to start new businessses, most of your neighbours, friends and relatives would be discouraging you. In Alberta the attitude is different. Most people would tell you to go for it and if you fail, there is no shame, that's part of business and you try again.

    I hope a change of government would be an encouragement to people.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:04 PM  

  • Anonymous:

    Just because I gave credit where credit is due on the corporate tax cuts, does not mean that I think the government, generally speaking, is “doing the right things.” I think the tax cut was long overdue and the years when we had the highest effective corporate tax rate in the country undoubtedly hurt business prospects. I definitely do not think rural Saskatchewan is doing well. Just because there was one announcement of good news to which I have referred does not mean that I think things are good. On the contrary, what I meant to say is that there is potential for good things to happen but they are not. Call me a conspiracy theorist if you want, but I do believe the NDP cares little about rural Saskatchewan and is set on systematically decimating rural areas so that the power shifts to the cities, where they find their base of support. In fact, I have heard as much uttered by high-ranking officials in the party. Perhaps your friends who are running businesses are making more money than ever but that does not mean that they couldn’t be doing even better. It has become the attitude of so many people in this province that if times are good then the NDP must be doing a good job. Well, they should be much better and I believe that a new government would work very hard to outdo anything that the previous government did. In terms of policy, why don’t you check out the Saskatchewan Party’s Website and consider for a moment what the policies that they plan to implement could do for Saskatchewan’s future.

    Paulie:

    I think you are correct in what you say. People here are jealous of another success, but that’s symptomatic of socialist envy, and, as I said, it is because of the socialist culture that exists here that we are so different from Albertans. It reminds me of a quote from Winston Churchill: "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill.

    By Blogger Saskatory, at 1:27 AM  

  • Well, I read something in Mandry's column today that I think foreshadow's SaskParty plans. He toys with the idea of selling crowns to pay for debt. Funny that he brings that up. Our debt is now at a very low level at 7.8 billion. I understand its low and maybe more needs to be done to bring that level down. Is that what right considers a growth agenda? If you think about it, the crowns might add up to be enough to pay off the debt. I know Hernmanson toyed with the idea in the last election but didn't come right out and say it. Maybe there is an appetite out there for that. So going back to Mandryk, maybe that's what the SP should do. Make a bold, albeit risky move?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:39 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home