Saskatory

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Day 1: Analysis of Political Realm in Saskatchewan

The long wait amongst political junkies like myself has ended. The proverbial bell has tolled, the writ’s been dropped, and Saskatchewanians are heading to the polls on November 7th. Indeed, this is an exciting time not just for political gurus but for all people of this fine province.

Saskatchewan is in the peculiar position of having a 16-year government that appears to be in its last days of office, while at the same time experiencing an unprecedented economic boom. In most cases, a government should feel extremely confident running a campaign when the economic times are positive, prosperity abounds, and life is generally good for its citizens. However, that is not the case for Lorne Calvert’s regime. Rather, instead of being happy that times are good, the people of Saskatchewan can’t help but feel that things could be better and a change in government might be just the ticket to achieve that.

In comes Brad Wall and the ideologically revamped Saskatchewan Party, which has appeared to much of the populace as the province’s government in waiting since Wall became leader. The scary right wing ideologues that ran against Calvert in 2003 have had their image softened, policies adjusted, and with Wall at the helm have taken on a more friendly, likeable, and dare I say sophisticated aura. It is no longer the party of rural Saskatchewan that it was in 1999 and 2003. It had to adjust if it ever wished to break into Saskatoon and Regina and adjust it has.

Meanwhile, the provincial Liberals sit at the sidelines, wondering which of the other parties will take office. David Karwacki has stated that he intends to keep the Saskatchewan Party and NDP accountable. Perhaps he has already resigned his party to that of an opposition. The people of Saskatchewan will likely have similar sentiment, resigning Karwacki and the Liberals to irrelevant status in the whole scheme of things.

As a voter, I am bringing to this campaign a hope that change will result and the Saskatchewan Party will emerge victorious. Truth be told, I am unabashedly partisan and an ardent supporter of the Saskatchewan Party. As a partisan supporter, my expectations for the upcoming election might be different than the average voter’s.

I expect that the shortage of health care professionals, managing the recent economic boom, growing our province, creating opportunities for young people, the environment and rural revitalization will dominate the campaign discourse in the weeks to come. As to where the parties will stand on each of these items is to be seen.

At the same time, it has been pointed out that the three parties running in this election all hug the centre. With its personal and corporate tax cuts, the NDP is perhaps not the socialist party that has been previously. And, with its assurances that it will not sell off Saskatchewan’s crown corporations or implement any private health care measures, the Saskatchewan Party is more centrist that its opponents would like you to believe. And the Liberals, who have always been more centrist / centre-right appear to have retained that placement on the spectrum.

Because of this, it is likely that the parties’ platforms will differ little on the main issues. Instead, I predict that the parties will resort to personal and emotional measures to differentiate themselves from one another. This will inevitably mean a dirty and messy campaign full of all the mud-slinging, fear mongering, and personal attacks one can hope for. And, while people often complain they are turned off by this, I for one cannot wait.

Indeed, while many people keeping a close on this election are wondering for whom that bell will be tolling when all is said and done, the answer might lie in who escapes with the least mud on his face. Meanwhile, I intend to revel in watching that mud being flung.

16 Comments:

  • Yes, all we need is to elect a right wing government to flush the economic boom down the toilet. Just as they have done in every jurisdiction they have assumed control over. History tells me that conservative governments are very good at ruining economic booms.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:27 PM  

  • Yes, Quimby. That's exactly what they've done in Alberta. It looks to me like that boom was completely flushed away. To what booms are you referring anyway?

    By Blogger Saskatory, at 3:49 PM  

  • Quimby is making the rounds on every blog he can to slam the Sask Party. He knows his party is DOA and it must be very frustrating for him. The electorate of Saskatchewan is going to make him feel like a little dog about to get his nose rubbed in a big pile of NDP crap. Enjoy!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:20 PM  

  • Alberta, anyone can have a booming economy with resource prices through the roof. They've done nothing special. They need an NDP government to continue the boom. It's time for a change in Alberta.

    Sound Familiar?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:38 PM  

  • No one in Alberta is talking about an NDP government. Resource prices through the roof you say. When you say: "anyone can have a booming economy with resource prices through the roof", you couldn't be more right. Even a tired, old government led by an incompetent troll of a man can manage to govern a province during the time of a boom. Our boom has nothing to do with Calvert or his government. It is pure dumb luck. We'll see that when this province really takes off in the upcoming months when the government changes. Nice try fear mongering but your statements are trite and unfounded. If you can bring something intelligent to the comments section, please do so. If you want to continue with asinine rhetoric, please troll somewhere else.

    By Blogger Saskatory, at 4:57 PM  

  • How can you live with yourself Brad?

    The same issues you criticize Calvert for you praise Stelmach on. If it is true of Calvert then it is true of Getty,Klein and Stelmach (speaking of tired old governments).

    You see, I just took Wall's talking points and transposed them on AB. Funny how that works.

    Whatchaya got now, Lord Farquahar.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:32 PM  

  • I don't know why you're calling me Brad...

    Anyway, I'm not praising Stellmach I've just said that right wing governments haven't always ruined booms. Simple as that. Your assertions were untrue.

    That should be the end of that but for you some reason you like to talk in circles.

    By Blogger Saskatory, at 5:35 PM  

  • You are Brad "Lord" Farquhar (sp?), former CPC candidate in Wascana and sessional lecturer at U of R.

    Let's see Devine, Harris, Bennett (both), Bush (both)and Mulroney. Your only example of one that hasn't is in AB but by your own admission, any one could do it with those resources and prices.

    So, who's talking in circles?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:44 PM  

  • What boom were Bennett Mulroney, or Devine for that matter inheriting? All of those were either ruling during the depression or a recession. Take a history lesson. And to answer your question - you are the one talking in circles. The boom in BC seems to be managed quite well right now by the Campbell government as well.

    In fact, there are few times in history when a political party has taken office during an economic boom. Most often if there is a boom then the party in power during it will be re-elected. So I don't exactly know when it has been that conservative governments have "ruined" booms.

    And what makes me think I'm Brad Farquar? I've heard of Brad but do not know him and have never met him. You sure think you're smart but once again you're wrong, as per usual.

    By Blogger Saskatory, at 6:40 PM  

  • I for one am doing my Part in the election. Putting up signs for the SaskParty.

    By Blogger huffb1, at 6:45 PM  

  • Sigh! Give up, saskatory. As anonymous @4:20 PM pointed out, mayor quimby knows his beloved NDP is going down in flames, and he can't help but lash out in frustration. I think it could very well be as bad as the electoral massacre of 1982. I hope it isn't because landslide victories aren't good for anyone as it takes a healthy-sized opposition to keep the government on its toes. However, if it is that bad, the NDP will have only itself to blame with its attitude of extreme hubris the last 16 years.

    By Blogger Brian in Calgary, at 6:50 PM  

  • Bennett(wacky) engineered the great depression and many hisrorians believe that even accelarated it. Devine inherited balanced budgets and bankrupted the province. Mulroney well not taking power during a boom did manage to worsen the situation. Bush 1 managed to squander to so called peace dividend and his son has managed to intiate the beginnings of an economic disaster. So you check your history, Bradly.

    As for BC come spring of 2010, you will witness a massive contraction in the economy. As the majority of the growth is due to the Olympics, not Campbell. Though isn't he a Liberal?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:46 PM  

  • Quimby,

    Bennett engineered the great depression? I thought that had something to do with the 1929 stock market crash but since you know everything I guess I'll just have to trust you.

    Just because there were balanced budgets prior to Devine taking office doesn't mean there was an economic boom. And there definitely were not balanced budgets when Mulroney came in after Trudeaus spending sprees in the 70's. I really couldn't care less about American politics so I won't even go there.

    As far as the Olympics being the ONLY reason for economic growth in BC, you've got to be kidding me. The economy will surely not crash when the games end. As for Campbell being a Liberal, the name really means nothing. I'm talking about ideology not party label. Similarly, many might characterize Paul Martin, during his term as Finance Minister as a fiscal conservative.

    You can continue to call me Brad all you'd like but I just think it's funny how you're wrong about yet another thing.

    By Blogger Saskatory, at 12:15 AM  

  • Right Liberal and Conservative are the same thing.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:53 AM  

  • Posted at Lance's Blog but since you want to debate me in 3 different places, here ya go.

    I think you are trying to disguise the truth about this ill conceived plan vs. the governments current program and the NDP's election promise on tuition.

    The Saskatchewan Party's plan is for a direct tuition deduction from your provincial income tax for residents of Saskatchewan graduating from a PS institution in Saskatchewan, for up to $20,000 in 7 years. The increments are 10/10/10/10/20/20/20 with 10% equal about $2,000. While trades certificates are receiving substantially less, an area in great demand and graduate studies(MD, DMD, etc.) are not covered.

    The SP plan would benefit about 50% graduates in the first 4 years that made over $20,000+$10,000(Personal Tax exemption guesstimate) or $30k with no other deductions) Since most grads would have tuition deductions, student loan interest to deduct; the amount increases to about $35k. Now, if one has kids and daycare deductions that increases it to $45k. Using the bare minimum of $30k according to SaskTory's stats over half would not receive a maximum benefit from this proposal; since the median falls below this number. Having other deduction, which most graduates would surely have only increases the amount of graduates not benefiting fully from this idea. This does not even include the cost of $4,000 more in tuition under the SP, by not implementing the McCall report. At 7% over only 10 years will cost close to $3,000 more dollars. Further reducing the number of graduates that will benefit and in turn stay in the province.

    While the current government has instituted a $1,000 deduction per year for 5 years to graduates of any PS institution in Canada, including trades and grad studies. The income level to fully benefit from this deduction ranges from $20k-35K. Thus including more graduates. When this is coupled with the NDP's plank of reducing tuition by $1,000 per year, it is clearly superior to the SP scheme. The savings to grads in interest costs alone by far helps more students borrow, attend, have to work less and perform better. The NDP's plan is more inclusive therefore having a broader market to entice to stay and at the same time makes PSE more accessible to everyone.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:22 AM  

  • Hi Saskatory,

    Don't be so quick to write off the Saskatchewan Liberals! We can pick up a few seats in this election. We are running the best Sask Liberal campaign this time in living memory!

    By Blogger John Murney , at 4:24 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home